Friday, October 8, 2010

* Brothers Both

Christopher Mark Keane and Ma
 






Dear Mr. Shaffer,


I too lost a brother named Christopher.
Jaqueline Kennedy said that the only thing which gave her comfort after her husband's assassination was this poem by A. E. Housman. You have already felt its wisdom as your tender tribute indicates. I believe that your writing gift will become his evolving memorial, as every word you write hereafter will be tinged with the pain and joy of his memory. It is art's way of keeping him close. My sincere condolences.


Paul Keane




XIX. To an Athlete Dying Young




by A. E. Housman (1859-1936)


The time you won your town the race
We chaired you through the market-place;
Man and boy stood cheering by,
And home we brought you shoulder-high.


To-day, the road all runners come,
Shoulder-high we bring you home,
And set you at your threshold down,
Townsman of a stiller town.


Smart lad, to slip betimes away
From fields were glory does not stay
And early though the laurel grows
It withers quicker than the rose.


Eyes the shady night has shut
Cannot see the record cut,
And silence sounds no worse than cheers
After earth has stopped the ears:


Now you will not swell the rout
Of lads that wore their honours out,
Runners whom renown outran
And the name died before the man.


So set, before its echoes fade,
The fleet foot on the sill of shade,
And hold to the low lintel up
The still-defended challenge-cup.


And round that early-laurelled head
Will flock to gaze the strengthless dead,
And find unwithered on its curls
The garland briefer than a girl's.
____________________________________






Childhood, Interrupted

by Matthew Shaffer
Friday, October 1, 2010
The Yale Daily News






NEW YORK — On Aug. 21, I finished moving in, and stared at my ceiling, and felt what I tried to feel after graduation when I wouldn’t smash my church pipe, and was too hurried to feel in the road trips and fellowships that followed — Yale and childhood were over. That night, down Manhattan and across the Hudson, my oldest brother Christopher fell over in his apartment in Hoboken and died.


Christmas Eve will be 29 years since my parents carried him from the hospital to their first house, decorated by friends with “To Mary and David a child is born.” Our childhood was Edenic (or maybe it’s the other way around and the myth universally fascinates because it retells every story of childhood lost). I was the fourth, a mistake — but my parents rejoiced in being overburdened. My father called us his “nice little pile of kids,” and, we were often literally in a pile when our parents came home at dusk and we ran to their knees. Our childhood happiness was that every single thing — our pillow forts and igloos and bike-jumps — was done for its own sake. In adulthood, parties become networking for Mammon, play becomes exercise for the body — everything becomes an instrument for a final end which is eternally postponed and never enjoyed. But for us, there was no future, only imminent joy, because we thought childhood would never be interrupted.


Why store for winter in endless summer?


Every day now is a new rupture. Christopher saw me born and held me through my first steps, so his living presence wasn’t so much a fact of the world as a quality of my universe. Every day now his death must be relearned, his name moved in my mental account from the column of the living to the dead. Every day the raw fact startles me, again.


I wanted them to have something to remember Christopher by, so I said something unusual in my eulogy, the opposite of what people usually say: Christopher’s death made perfect sense. Because it would make sense that before He put our souls in our infant bodies, God gave us a choice between an ordinary regular life, or a life of delirious happiness in childhood and being the hero of the swim team and best looking in high school and getting recruited by every college and being the coolest in the best fraternity at Cornell and being a professional athlete and dating girls from magazine covers after and then becoming a top young trader on Wall Street and finding an expensive fast car and the perfect girl — but the trade-off is that if you choose this life, you fall down and die at 28. And that makes sense because that’s a trade that maybe Christopher would make. At the wake, half a mile of old friends waited two hours to comfort my family for a few seconds, and I realized that Christopher had won the sibling rivalry, that his premature death was the stamp that he was the coolest Shaffer and could never be beaten.


My recurring dream is set 12 years ago, I think, because the old pine tree on the hill in the front lawn still stands, and Chris looks like he did when he captained the high school swim team. We four children are sitting in the front yard, at the base of the hill, and it’s early October, the trees are just beginning to blush and a brisk wind has taken some golden needles from the old pine above and laid them round us. We’re dressed up, though I don’t know why, and even though the dream has just begun I know we’ve been laughing for a while. We’re awaiting some important arrival, but of what I can’t remember. But then Pat’s face contorts, and Kathleen buries her head in her arms, and I see what they see — a black and wolfishly narrow van with opaque windows silently slouches up the driveway and stops the wind. I turn back to my siblings, and Pat and Kathleen cry, but Chris just stares at the van, motionless and pacific, as the sunset gilds his cheeks with slight regret, and he almost smiles. And then I remember what happened and what the van means, and I hug the grass and the dream ends.


Such dreams are actually a relief from the modern affectations requiring that grief be widely advertised for a few days, and, thereafter confined to a therapist, whose hourly rate, resplendent jargon and credentialed walls comfort modern man in the belief that his sorrow is managed with the clinical expertise of a Professional — a high priest of our secular age.


Perhaps it signifies lost innocence that I see new shades in the New York skyline. When I lived with Christopher last summer, I would go for runs around the reservoir in Central Park after work, as he would bike around the outer loops, and I thrilled to watch the sun set, as the buildings that hugged the park’s contours would go on humming with life and bright orange light into the night — what glamour, so different from my childhood. Now, I run that same, remindful loop and the pale reds of the skyscrapers are menacing and hateful for detaining parents from their families so late — what vanity, so different from my childhood. And the greatest city in the world is polluted as the city that killed my brother.


One of the old Buckley stories passed around the National Review office is about the letter an admiring boy sent Bill, requesting advice for growing up. The preeminent sesquipedalian replied, “Don’t.” I forward his advice to Yale seniors contemplating graduation from college, which, for good and bad, is extended childhood. Children think they want to grow up, but once we do we all want childhood back. Just observe young couples: As soon as they are comfortable, they begin treating each other like children. And then they get to the business of laying aside their own lives to make new childhoods.


(My adventure into adult life, I should say, has made me a political journalist. Politics is the depressing combination of the particular vices of childhood and adulthood each, the retention of neither’s virtues. Avoid it.)


After deaths, people become less political and more religious. Some attribute our invention of heaven to weak selfishness. There’s some truth there. (Who wouldn’t be weakened by death in the family?) But belief in heaven can’t be entirely selfish. We invented hell, too, because we would hug the fire if we could be with family again. Religious hope — replaced in the modern world by faith in plastic surgery and 30 years of well-pensioned retirement — is the hope that the world of commutes and “professionalism” and taxes and networking is only an interruption to childhood, and that we will be like children again and tumble and hide in the garden under the old pine tree on the hill, and parents will come home from work at dusk to find their nice little pile of kids still whole.


There is enough mystery — for me, Christopher’s promising smile in the uncanny dream — still, for us to hope for second childhood.


Matthew Shaffer is a 2010 graduate of Davenport College.





___________________________________




Damn you, Mr. Shaffer, for making me cry at 7:45 in the morning.






Posted by FailBoat on October 1, 2010 at 7:48 a.m.


 Now this is exquisite writing.






Posted by penny_lane on October 1, 2010 at 2:25 p.m


 THANK YOU for sharing such a deeply personal reminder for us all...






Posted by webster on October 1, 2010 at 4:35 p.m.


Magnificent






Posted by Madas on October 2, 2010 at 1:39 a.m.


 Matt, this is beautiful. As someone who was constantly opposed to you during school, this was both a shock and a reminder that politics don't really matter in the end--it's our common humanity that should be the starting point for our interactions. Thank you for being so open and willing to share something extremely personal. All the best to you and your family.






Posted by Spider09 on October 2, 2010 at 10:18 p.m.
Christopher with Paul

Thursday, October 7, 2010

* British Bobbys Not: Police in New Haven, the U.S.of A.

Abner Louima in 1991 after New York City Police sodomized him with a plunger handle.


Today’s New York Times features an article about excessive force and foul language used on and against Yale students by New Haven Police conducting a late night raid for liquor violations on a New Haven Night Club boastfully named “Elevate”, as if getting “higher” was the mission statement.


I was amazed at the “wet-behind-the-ears” quality of the Yale students, not only in the Times’ report, but in the videos offered on The Yale Daily News website itself. It is as if the last fifty-years of current events in America had been erased and we were beginning over again fresh with this 20-year-old generation.

“Police are brutal? UNBELIEVABLE”, the Yale students seem to stammer.


This is the country where Ohio males in law enforcement uniforms murdered four unarmed white students on a university campus in May, 1970; where three weeks later in Mississippi, sheriffs murdered two black university students ; where in Los Angeles, in 1991, police beat the African American Rodney King unconscious after he was stopped for possible arrest; where in New York City police sodomized the Haitian, Abner Louima*, with a plunger handle in 1997.


Why are Yale students so amazed that the police are “brutal”?


Most American police officers and even National Guardsmen, have not had the luxury of a liberal arts college education which opens their eyes to the values of freedom of speech and freedom of expression. They are, by and large, inarticulate capsules of male hormones, trapped in bodies trained to respond with physical force, unable to express themselves in subordinate clauses but agile with grunts of profanity. Add to this combination the glamour of a uniform and badge and the “clubbiness” of belonging to a well honed group whose chief default is the “power” of armed weapons, and you have the recipe for brutality.


C’mon Yale students. Open your eyes.


Paul Keane
M. Div. ‘80
M.A., M.Ed.






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Abner Louima (b. 1966 in Thomassin, Haiti) is a Haitian who was assaulted, brutalized and forcibly sodomized with the handle of a bathroom plunger by New York City police officers after being arrested outside a Brooklyn nightclub in 1997.

Wednesday, October 6, 2010

* The Truth will Out: Protecting the Mess


Protecting the Mess



Democracy is messy.


 Jefferson reportedly told a foreign dignitary visiting the President who was shocked that the President "allowed" newspapers to publish reports that he had a slave mistress: This what "freedom of the press" guarantees - - - the right to criticize one's rulers. 'The truth will out' is what we believe about the free play of competing ideas.


Yes. Freedom of the press is messy but freedom of speech is messier.


Today's Supreme Court heard the case of  the father of a Marine killed in the recent war whose funeral was picketed by a church which believes war casualties are God's punishment on Americans for permitting homosexuality to be legal between consenting adults.  The picketers carry signs saying "God Hates Fags" and "Thank God for War Dead".  They chanted these slogans across the street from the church where the funeral was taking place.


The father of the deceased Marine claims this is a violation of his right to privacy. "It is a FUNERAL, for God's sake," he said on a TV interview this evening on the PBS News Hour.


Just as people have a right ot express their vulgar and ugly opinions across the street from someone's funeral service, so too does a religious organization have the right to build a community center two blocks from the site where 3000 Americans were murdered by terrorists chanting one of the chief  invocations of that religion, "Allahu Akbar".


Democracy is messiest when freedoms intersect and clash.

The wildest, toughest and most glorious of weeds, Freedom discovers the mess to be manure:

And flourishes.

Monday, October 4, 2010

* Mr. Lord Ain't My Lord


Crumpets with my teapot, please.

The Dean of Yale Divinity School, Harold Attridge, has criticized a blog article in The New Spectator by Jeffrey Lord, entitled, “Coons: I Will Bring Yale Divinity School Values to Senate”.


Mr. Coons, running against the Delaware surprise candidate Christine O’Donnell, who has recently been crucified by the press for remarks she made about witchcraft as a youth, has made a fatal political mistake, which shouts from his own quotation “I Will Bring Yale Divinity School Values to Senate”. He has failed to understand that Yale “anything” (Divinity, Medical, Drama School, you name it) is perceived by the public as elitist:

He's simply added more boiling water to the already screaching national egalitarian teapot.


Mr. Lord, on the other hand, (and he’ ain’t MY LORD) has made a fatal intellectual mistake in his saucy satire of Yale Divinity School which eviscerates the values of its courses, books and professors, and lays their leftist (“marxist”) entrails on the mortuary table for all to revile:


Mr. Lord assumes that Yale Divinity School is ashamed of its “leftist” heritage and will be embarrassed by his (Lord’s) satire. Note: Wasn't there a Palestinian Carpeneter 2000 years ago who advocated sharing all one's possessions with the poor?  Sounds like the orginal "leftist" to me.


Just to prove him wrong (and to celebrate that lefty-ist of all left ideals, FREEDOM OF SPEECH), Dean Attridge publishes the link to Lord’s article in his own statement criticizing its shallowness (see link below).

Yale Divinity School isn't ashamed of its heritage----nor should it be.

Paul D. Keane
M. Div. '80
M.A., M.Ed.


http://www.yale.edu/divinity/notes/101004/values.shtml



Here are some quotes from the Lord article:
Coons: I Will Bring Yale Divinity School Values to Senate


By Jeffrey Lord on 9.27.10 @ 6:09AM

Serving in the United States Senate would be a "great way for me to apply the principles and values that were honed at YDS." --Delaware Democrat and U.S. Senate nominee Chris Coons, to the Yale Divinity School Notes from the Quad, September, 2010


. . . Coons, reported his YDS interviewer, "animatedly" vowed he was determined to bring the values he learned at YDS to Washington as a Delaware Senator. Those values -- formed by a school teaching Witchcraft as multiculturalism, Queer Worship, feminist theology, liberation theology and recognizing a Catholic nun as an ethicist because she openly opposes Catholic doctrine while accepting the offices and honors of her church -- would be considered little short of bizarre by millions of Americans were they aware of them. Tellingly, like many liberals who live out the famous quote from the late liberal New Yorker film reviewer Pauline Kael (who is said by the New York Times to have remarked after Nixon's 49-state victory over George McGovern that she couldn't understand this because "I only know one person who voted for Nixon"), Coons is clueless, adrift in the liberal bubble. . .




And Christine O'Donnell is not in the mainstream? How utterly laughable. Among other lessons in looking at the values Coons promotes is the realization that liberals who study in glass covens shouldn't throw broomsticks . . .




The values taught at Yale Divinity School. Values exemplified by the exotic, overripe teachings, readings, preachings, and writings of socialists, Marxists, and camp followers of Liberation Theology who believe in one variation or another that capitalism is immoral, a sin. This includes the one-time Dean Thomas Ogletree and his late writing partner the American Communist Party's Herbert Aptheker, the assigned writings of Liberation Theology's James Cone, Ronald Sider the anti-capitalist Evangelical leftist, and the Brazilian socialist Paulo Freire. Their philosophy, it is now abundantly clear, is at the core of the values taught by the Yale Divinity School that Coons so admires.

Sunday, October 3, 2010

* Fertilization Proclamation ?


What would happen if Sarah Palin was elected President and issued a
Fertilization Proclamation: All fertilized human eggs are human life and are from this date forward  emancipated from medical slavery?

Saturday, October 2, 2010

* Yale Professor Liberates those Imprisoned by Bible

Yale's Sterling Professor of History, the late John Boswell
Half of the Bloomsbury Affair: Oscar Wilde
 A biblical scholar publishing her insights for all to read

Burying the Bloom of Youth and Unearthing the Rutgers' Hatred

In America it was never AGAINST THE LAW to engage in womanly behavior; or Jewish behavior; or African American behavior. However in AMERICA, LAND OF THE FREE,  until 1986 (24 years ago), when the Supreme Court overturned sodomy laws in Lawrence v. Texas, it was against the law to engage  in homosexual behavior.


This, it seems to me, makes the history of discrimination in our land against homosexual men and women qualitatively different from sexism, racism and anti-semitism.


In the latter, people just hated the oppressed for WHO THEY WERE GENETICALLY: Female, African, Jewish ( and Jewish folk insist there is a genetic component requisite to be an "authentic" Jew, although they permit conversion to the religion).


In the former, people hated the oppressed  not for their genes* but for what they chose to DO: Use erogenous zones of their body in a particular manner. I'll leave it up to you whether this makes it a more heinous form of discrimination than genetic discrimination, or not.


However,  unlike racism, sexism and anti-semitism, Americans  translated this hatred into legal punisment: It was ILLEGAL in all states in America for decades to engage in sodomy (non-heterosexual, non-missionary-position, sex) and punishable by imprisonment and social disgrace.




The taboo against sodomy was nurtured over thousands of years by biblical mis-translations which have been debunked by recent biblical scholarship, including that of the late Yale Sterling Professor of History, John Boswell, whose book, Christianity, Social Tolerance and Homosexuality, examines all of the biblical passages used as proof-texts for the prohibition of sodomy, and exposes them as mis-translations or worse.


It is no surprise then that a Rutgers student comitted suicide last week when his roomate and that roomate's girlfriend conspired against his privacy by videotaping and publishing on the Internet footage of the young man making love with another "dude" (as the conspiring roommate described the liaison of his soon to be deceased roommate, in a text message).


Would another male student have committed suicide if a videotape of himself making love with a "non-dude" (i.e., a woman) had been broadcast on the Internet?

Probably not.  Indeed he might have bragged of his sexual prowess.

However,  if such an act had happened 30 years ago, the female might have committed suicide.

It is always the the oppressed who fear.

Our society should be ashamed.

________________________
* The nurture/nature question about the source of same gender attraction is still open to debate.

Friday, October 1, 2010

*Rutgers Rape of Privacy: A Digital Disgrace


Rutgers' Scarlet Shame

Some expert opining about the world of digital dangers on tonight's PBS News Hour with Jim Lehrer actually tried to suggest that the  Rutgers student who videotaped his roomate having sex with a friend of the same gender and POSTED IT ON THE INTERNET may "not have understood that this was wrong" due to the new epidemic of personal disclosures on social networks like facebook which have blurred the boundaries of privacy.

This is unmitigated liberal relativistic MALE-BOVINE FECES.


I consider myself a bona fide, certified, five-decade weathered liberal; but, I am sick and tired of having words reduced to meaningless graphic arrangements of ink by the new "relativism."

Privacy is privacy.

Wrong is wrong.

Cruelty is cruelty.

The digital dilution of these standards is not an excuse for abandoning them, or excusing their violation.

PERIOD.

END OF DISCUSSION.

(Unless, of course, we want to admit we have raised a generation of  sadistic Ids without 
Super-egos by abandoning child-rearing by parents to child-rearing by day-care centers and babysitting by television.)