Sunday, September 19, 2010

* Salivating the Burger




Even if Pavlov hadn’t “signed a steak” with an electromagnetic knife at Yale in 1929 after witnessing Dr. Cushing perform brain surgery with that knife*, a hundred million American’s would still salivate every time they pass McDonald’s today,  in September 2010.




Steak is in our blood, figuratively and literally.


Especially Yale blood.


The Whiffenpoof’s serenade “From the tables down at Morey’s to the place where Louie dwells, baaah, baaah, baaah” is so well known even townies sing it.




Morey’s is the (once exclusive) Yale eating club, which almost went bankrupt last year. Louie’s is “Louie’s Lunch”, a tiny restaurant in New Haven where Louie Lassen *(according to the Library of Congress) “invented” the hamburger in 1900.


A small town in Texas claims it is the home of the hamburger’s birth in the 1880’s, and commemorates that claim with a plaque. A Wisconsin town also claims the title.


Louie’s Lunch still exists in its original tiny brick building in New Haven Connecticut, and still serves the same burger, the same way: NO ketchup, white toast, burger, tomato and cheese, grilled in front of your eyes.


I have eaten two rival burgers in my day. In the early 1970’s a small restaurant in Kent, Ohio, served a concoction called the “Garbageburger”. It had everything on it. When the place cloased I even wrote a tribute to the Garbageburger for the Daily Kent Stater (below).


The second rival to Louie’s in New Haven, is an Ivy league hang-out in Hanover called, Everything But Anchovies (EBA’s). Their concoction is called the EBA Burger.


I eat one almost every Tuesday night.



James Beard, the famous chef, when asked to name the ONE meal he would cook if it was his LAST meal, said, “Bacon and eggs.”


I would choose the EBA Burger for my Last Supper.


(Only because the Garbageburger is dead.)
________________________________

*Yale Alumni Magazine Sept/Oct 2010 “Why Pavlov signed a steak” (“Object lesson ‘Pavlov’s beef-steak,’” p.60)

_________________________________________________

Wednesday, March 7, 1973 Vol XVII Number 76 (Daily Kent Stater)




A remembrance: Life and Death of the Garbageburger



by



Broderick Euclid [aka Paul Keane]






The 3000 or so members of the KSU community who have partaken of Carson’s culinary misnomer will find this column entitled “Requiem for the Garbageburger,” a sad sacrament indeed; for it marks the end of an era in Kent, Ohio, and a nostalgic farewell to the non-computerized mentality.


Carson’s Tavern was the white clapboard building --- now called “The Tavern” --- actoss from the Kentwood on Route 59. And its house-special, which people flocked form miles around to try, was the Garbageburger.


What was a Garbageburger. It was more than a mountain-sandwich, held together by the stab of a toothpick; it was an anachronism in culinary hospitality in our culture of assembly-line food. When a Garbageburger was placed in front of you, you’d gasp, “How can I BEGIN to eat it?”


The only thing you didn’t do was take the toothpick out, for you’s soon discover why it sported its provocative name: the inevitable consequence of the first bite into a toothpickless Garbageburger was that all that was INSIDE the G.B. fell OUTSIDE onto your plate, thus becoming garbage. Voila, the Garbageburger.


And precisely what was inside it? Just about everything: thick handmade patty of ground beef dripping with yellow cheese( it HAD to be handmade, a computer would never have been reckless enough to give the customer so much meat); a solid disc of fresh, juicy onion; two substantial slices of authentic tomato (not the artificially colored substitute); a big splatter of gooey, yellow mustard; and a lather of Carson’s special white sauce, all precariously stacked between two buns garlanded with lettuce. And all for only 79 cents!!!


A Garbageburger was all that, but it was much more too.


The Garbageburger was a symbol of its creator’s humanity. No frantic pursuit of the Divine Dollar for him. Indeed, Carson’s had no telephone, rarely, if ever, advertised, and didn’t even have a sign saying “Carson’s” outside its door. It was just “that white building” outon route 59 near the bowling alley and across from the Kentwood. The clientele were more a club than a public. People came from miles around on word-of-mouth and, once initiated into its culinary courtesy and folksy décor (nothing matched in Carson’s, it was as if your Grandmother decorated it from odds and ends), they returned again and again.


Last month I presided over the last rites of the Garbageburger. I entered the now renamed and redecorated Carson’s (it will always be Carson’s to me, no matter what they re-name it) and learned that the G.B. had expired. The couple sitting in the booth next to me asked for the famous sandwich. When they learned it no longer existed either in name or content (oh, there’s a substitute they try to pawn off as heir to the G.B., but it’s nothing like the original) they lamented , “Nothing lasts.”


On that poignant note, I called the young owner of the place over to my table. “I don’t see how you’ll make it without the Garbageburger,” I said, “it’s a tradition in Kent.”


“We’re not interested in tradition,” he replied, “we’re interested in business. And business is better than it’s ever been before.”


He is probably right. Alas, his business probably is better than ever; but the quality of life in computerized-consumerized Kent (this gypsy camp of plastic hamburger stands and beer joints) is immeasurably diminished.


And the voice of Jacob Marley’s ghost, rebutting Scrooge’s famous mercantile rationalization (“But I was always a good man of business, Jacob.”) rings in my ears: Business, Ebenezer? Mankind was your business.”



*Was there a Bono before Bono?


Art As Salvation

One of the remarkable things about Bono and his humanitarian predecessors (Bob Hope and Albert Schweitzer) is that their status as artists enabled them to further their humanitarian goals. Schweitzer would leave his hand-built hospital in Lambarene, Gabon in Africa every decade and give organ recitals in Europe to raise funds for the hospital.

Bob Hope would donate his talent as comedian and entertainer (and his Christmas vacations) for decades to the servicemen and servicewomen in our military to cheer their hearts not only during WW II, but right up until the 1980's.

And of course, Bono's concerts are inseparable from his humanitarian work in Africa and in diminishing poverty globally. Today's New York Times features  Bono's optimistic opinion piece on the ten-year mark in Millenium Development Goals for 2015. It is encoraging to see progress, rather than regress , however slow it may be.

Art may indeed be salvation-----at  least for some of the suffering of our world.


Bono


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Paul David Hewson (born 10 May 1960), most commonly known by his stage name Bono, is an Irish singer and musician, best known for being the main vocalist of the Dublin-based rock band U2. Bono was born and raised in Dublin, Ireland, and attended Mount Temple Comprehensive School where he met his future wife, Ali Hewson, and the future members of U2. Bono writes almost all U2 lyrics, often using political, social, and religious themes. During their early years, Bono's lyrics contributed to U2's rebellious and spiritual tone. As the band matured, his lyrics became inspired more by personal experiences shared with members of U2.


Outside the band, he has collaborated and recorded with numerous artists, sits on the board of Elevation Partners, and has refurbished and owns The Clarence Hotel in Dublin with The Edge. Bono is also widely known for his activism concerning Africa, for which he co-founded DATA, EDUN, the ONE Campaign and Product Red. He has organised and played in several benefit concerts and has met with influential politicians. Bono has been praised and criticised for his activism and involvement with U2. He has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, was granted an honorary knighthood by Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom, and was named as a Person of the Year by Time, among other awards and nominations.



Albert Schweitzer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



Albert Schweitzer (14 January 1875 – 4 September 1965) was a Franco-German (Alsatian) theologian, organist, philosopher, and physician. He was born in Kaysersberg in the province of Alsace-Lorraine, in the German Empire. Schweitzer challenged both the secular view of Jesus as depicted by historical-critical methodology current at his time in certain academic circles, as well as the traditional Christian view, depicting a Jesus Christ who expected and predicted the imminent end of the world. He received the 1952 Nobel Peace Prize for his philosophy of "Reverence for Life", expressed in many ways, but most famously in founding and sustaining the Albert Schweitzer Hospital in Lambaréné, now in Gabon, west central Africa (then French Equatorial Africa). As a music scholar and organist, he studied the music of German composer Johann Sebastian Bach and influenced the Organ reform movement (Orgelbewegung).


Schweitzer's passionate quest was to discover a universal ethical philosophy, anchored in a universal reality, and make it directly available to all of humanity.

Bob Hope


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Bob Hope, KBE, KCSG, KSS (born Leslie Townes Hope; May 29, 1903 – July 27, 2003) was an American comedian and actor who appeared in vaudeville, on Broadway, and in radio, television and movies. He was also noted for his work with the US Armed Forces and his numerous USO shows entertaining American military personnel. Throughout his career, he was honored for his humanitarian work. In 1996, the U.S. Congress honored Bob Hope by declaring him the "first and only honorary veteran of the U.S. armed forces." Bob Hope appeared in or hosted 199 known USO shows.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

* craigskisst



Those kissed by the poison lips of craigslist's "adult services" section include a recent suicide, known as the "craigslist killer," a medical student in Boston who looks so preppy that one almost sympathizes with him, as did  his fiancee in disbelief after he was initially charged with murdering one woman and kidnapping another, both of whom he had met by trolling craigslist.

The self-censoring by craigslist [sic] of its advertisements for sexual services two days ago comes after 18 state's attorney's general wrote craigslist owners protesting that prostitution was not a "victimless crime" and asking craigslist to remove the section entirely which solicits customers for such services.

Instead craigslist slapped a "censored" sticker over the section to protest the infringement on its freedom of expression, while complying with the request.




Persoanlly, I find the craigslist killer incident unnerving.  I like my killers to look like madmen (or madwomen), Charles Manson say, but not Apple Pie and Motherhood in an intern's coat with a gleaming Steinway smile.



Good-looking or mad-looking, he was seduced by technology and betrayed by technology. (The video camera's stationed in the hotels where he attacked his victims dutifully recorded, dated,and timed his presence at the murder and kidnapping scenes.)

The lesson to be taken? 

Technology is a digital  briar-patch. 

Remember 
(the once beloved and now debunked as racist) Br'er Rabbit?

Saturday, September 4, 2010

* GOD (Genome's Obscure Distributor)






Like all good Unitarians and deists, the word "God" irritates me, the eternal questioner. 

Like "love," "God" has come to mean whatever people want it to mean. And it has an anthropomorphic (human face and body) connotation which seems decidedly limiting.

Enlightenment writers and Abraham Lincoln used the terms "Creator" and "Divine Providence" or just "Providence", all with capital letters at the beginning of the words. 

Twelve Step programs use the term"Higher Power" and then fill it in with acronyms: Good Orderly Direction (GOD); Gift Of Desperation (GOD); Group Of Drunks (AA acronym only).

These just aren't modern enough in our cracked-genetic-code world. So I propose this as a more accurate descriptor:

Genome's Obscure Distributor , both a definition and  an acronym for the term GOD.

And for DNA?  Divine Nature's Author.



Emerson would be pleased.


Paul Keane
M. Div. '80


PS:       Dylan-the-force-that-through-the-green-fuse-drives-the flower-drives-my-soul-Thomas might be pleased also.   Might.




Science Dictionary
genome (jē'nōm)

The total amount of genetic information in the chromosomes of an organism, including its genes and DNA sequences. The genome of eukaryotes is made up of a single, haploid set of chromosomes that is contained in the nucleus of every cell and exists in two copies in the chromosomes of all cells except reproductive and red blood cells. The human genome is made up of about 35,000 genes. Compare proteome.

The American Heritage® Science Dictionary
Copyright © 2002. Published by Houghton Mifflin.


Cultural Dictionary

genome [( jee -nohm)]

The sum of all information contained in the DNA for any living thing. The sequence of all the nucleotides in all the chromosomes of an organism.

The American Heritage® New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition
Copyright © 2005 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company.



Cultural Dictionary


deism [( dee -iz-uhm)]

The belief that God has created the universe but remains apart from it and permits his creation to administer itself through natural laws. Deism thus rejects the supernatural aspects of religion, such as belief in revelation in the Bible, and stresses the importance of ethical conduct. In the eighteenth century, numerous important thinkers held deist beliefs. ( See clockwork universe.)

The American Heritage® New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition
Copyright © 2005 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
_____________________________________________________________

* Why Hate Jews?

The Yale Daily News 

Hershey: A debate to be had, not censored



Comments:


Why do people hate Jews?


I don't get it. Especially when CHRISTIANS hate Jews. Jesus was Jewish for, God's sake, from the days he was born to the day he died. The Last Supper was a Passover meal!


Is it elitism?


They hate the self-advertisement: The "Chosen people"?


That whole elitism is based on the most famous act of SEXISM in human history.


Sarah, Abraham's WIFE, is barren and Abraham wants MALE offspring so he takes a CONCUBINE ( a woman with whom he can stand stud) named Hagar and creates ISHMAEL (remember the famous line "Call me Ishmael"?) Then God (because he has a sense of humor) makes SARAH pregnant at age 90 and she gives birth to ISAAC, future father of the Tribes of Israel.


Here is the KERNEL of the thousands-year-old mid-east conflict, a kernel "conceived" (lol) in SEXISM:


Because Ishmael is ILLEGITIMATE and Isaac is LEGITIMATE, Isaac's offspring (the Tribes of Israel) are eligible for the title "Chosen". This leaves Ishmael's people (aka the Arab people) de facto the UNchosen people whether they accept the description or not.


Ergo 3000+ years of war. Nice going.


The whole things is a house-of-cards based on a SEXIST PREMISE: males and male "blood" (genes) passed on legitimately are BETTER than males and male blood passed on illegitimately.




NB: Herman Melville adds to the irony with "Call me Ishmael" (Call me the UNchosen one) since HIS Ishmael is the only member of the Pequod chosen NOT to be drowned by Moby Dick. Nice job Herman!


PK


Posted by theantiyale on September 4, 2010 at 10:30 a.m.




________________________________________________________
Thank you for such a thoughtful piece.
Posted by yale on September 3, 2010 at 10:32 a.m.


Could someone please explain how Palestinians, whose ancestors were Phoenicians, Nabataeans, Canaanites etc, can be anti-Semitic when they in fact are Semitic?
Posted by JackJ on September 3, 2010 at 3:20 p.m.


re: JackJ
Because over time, anti-Semitism has gained a more specific meaning. It's commonly defined as "discrimination against or prejudice or hostility toward Jews [specifically]," even though many Afro-Asiatic languages/historical peoples can be referred to as Semitic.
Posted by lev on September 3, 2010 at 4:26 p.m.




Hershey: A debate to be had, not censored

The Yale Daily News

Friday, September 3, 2010




A series of complaints has recently been directed against Yale for hosting a conference intended to address modern manifestations of anti-Semitism. On Aug. 30, the U.S. representative of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, Maen Rashid Areikat, denounced Yale for providing a platform for “right-wing extremists” and accused Yale of enabling the dissemination of “racist propaganda.” On Wednesday, Yaman Salahi LAW ’12 asserted that Yale was “providing a haven for bigoted ideas about Muslims and Arabs” by hosting the conference (“Anti-Semitism but not anti-hatred,” Sept. 1). But these charges fail to justify why Yale should be in the business of censoring speech that could potentially engender offense and, more importantly, they exploit legitimate sensitivity towards racism in order to preclude honest discussion about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.



As an institution aimed toward the education of its students, Yale is obliged to expose its students to all points of view, no matter how controversial. Given the emotionally charged nature of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, it is unsurprising that some took offense to the statements advanced by the pro-Israel advocates who spoke at last week’s conference. Were Yale to have sponsored a conference dedicated to the cause of a Palestinian state, or were it to finance an event featuring a speaker with strong Palestinian sympathies, many Yale students who support Israel would take offense for analogous reasons. Some might even go as far as to publicly condemn Yale for promoting an apologetic attitude towards Hamas.



The inherently subjective nature of what is considered offensive makes it impossible for Yale to impartially restrict the promulgation of “offensive” viewpoints, and the call for such measures to be taken threatens the free exchange of ideas on campus. To criticize Yale for failing to censor the views of academics is to subject legitimate discourse to the whims of those who are most vocal about their offense. By encouraging the administration to regulate what can and cannot be said on campus, such criticism puts the entire educational mission of Yale at risk — we cannot be expected to learn in an environment that is inimical to free-thinking and free-expression.



Even if one believes that free speech should be curtailed in certain cases, the question still remains as to whether any of the content of last week’s conference on modern anti-Semitism was truly “offensive.” The most controversial feature of the conference, cited in both the PLO’s vitriolic letter to President Levin and Salahi’s recent column, was a seminar titled “The Central Role of Palestinian Antisemitism in Creating the Palestinian Identity.” Of course, no thinking individual would allege that anti-Semitism is a universal characteristic of Palestinians, and though I did not personally attend this seminar, I highly doubt that this characterization was ever made.



Regardless of what was said in this seminar, it is undeniable that the Palestinian leadership has endeavored to inculcate its constituents with anti-Semitism. Hamas’s own charter favorably cites “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” and it explicitly labels the Jews as the enemy of Palestine. For some time there was a Palestinian children’s television show, “Pioneers of Tomorrow,” in which a character resembling Mickey Mouse espoused violent jihad and advocated the annihilation of the Jews (excerpts from this program can easily be located via search on YouTube).



All of this is simply to say that there is a legitimate discussion to be had regarding the extent to which anti-Semitism has shaped Palestinian identity in recent years, whether such prejudice is the result of Hamas’s machinations or of some other contributing factor. Academics should be free to dispute the prevalence of anti-Semitism in the Palestinian population, and similarly, they should be equally free to debate the extent to which anti-Muslim sentiment pervades Israel and other pro-Western societies. To take advantage of our society’s sensitivity towards racism by denouncing anyone who is willing to entertain the plausible belief that anti-Semitism may exercise an undue influence upon the lives of the Palestinian people as “bigoted” inhibits meaningful discourse concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and is only likely to further enable the very sort of blind, unthinking prejudice that it seeks to criticize.



Ken Hershey is a sophomore in Trumbull College.

Friday, September 3, 2010

* My Mama Done Tole Me . . .








Barbara Ward Keane and son circa 1949 (my brother)
The Yale Daily News

Brodsky: A serious need for casual feminists

Comments
No artist, no musician, no warrior, no statesman, no politician ever created a work as infinitely complex and beautiful as a human baby, especially in the short order of nine months.

Men are, and continue to be, subconsciously OVERAWED by the miraculous capacity of women as artists of the highest order, painting the ENTIRE canvas of CREATION itself.

Sexism is men’s bluff:

A conscious attempt to repress that awe and to overcome the inherently un-level playing-field onto which they are and have been thrust since the Garden of Eden: Women bring them onto the planet and women ensure that their genetic code will endure after their departure from the planet.

Men’s contribution to this process can hardly be called art.

Men could not EXIST without women and they know it.

Sexism is envy.

Sexism is anger.

pk
Posted by theantiyale on September 2, 2010 at 5:40 a.m.

Afterthought: I should add "no athlete and no scholar" to that opening 'catalogue of creators,'
Posted by theantiyale on September 2, 2010 at 5:52 a.m.

antiyale: your comments are an example of exactly the kind of extremism the author means to combat.

Alexandra: Great article, well-crafted, entirely necessary.
Posted by MC13 on September 2, 2010 at 11:05 a.m.


Maybe so. Sadly, it doesn't make it any less true. I wish those well who seek to make a better world. PK
Posted by theantiyale on September 2, 2010 at 4:22 p.m.


It's examples like this that make people not take claims of sexism seriously.
Posted by FailBoat on September 2, 2010 at 4:53 p.m.

Theantiyale: As a woman who does not wish to have children, and on behalf of women who physically cannot have children, I find your comment extremely disgusting.

It is condescending and closed-minded to essentially say that women should be praised because we gestate. I also think it is misguided to say that men oppress women because they are jealous of this talent. And comparing human gestation to human creativity is naive at best.

I'm sorry, maybe this is a reactionary comment, but I am more than a uterus.
Posted by curlysiren on September 2, 2010 at 8 p.m.

 I did not say women SHOULD be praised because of X. I said X makes males envious and angry SUBCONSCIOUSLY

I do not have children and do not wish to have children. Who says women HAVE to HAVE children?

And who says it is a TALENT? The artistry I am talking about is a cosmic artistry.

It is women's CAPACITY (not TALENT) to reproduce another human being and men's INCAPACITY to do so that I am talking about.

I understand that in the not too distant future males will be able to have a zygote implanted in their lower intestine and bring it to term.

Perhaps this phenomenon will end sexism once and for all.


 Okay, Freud. I guess you wanted to sleep with your father too.
Posted by wtf on September 3, 2010 at 10:36 a.m

Trivialize Freud all you want. His is one of the three great minds of the last 200 years: Einstein, Darwin, Freud. This is not even susceptible to a sliver of debate. PK
Posted by theantiyale on September 3, 2010 at 4:06 p.m.

Theantiyale: I understand where you're coming from, I just don't agree with your claim that THAT is the reason men oppress women. Also, I only meant to point out that your statement is incredibly triggering to women who cannot have children and, to a lesser extent, women who choose not to have children.

Freud's theories were, at the time, quite groundbreaking. We should respect him because of that. However, he, and his theories, are not infallible. Both his and Darwin's theories have since been reevaluated and edited.
Posted by curlysiren on September 3, 2010 at 6:18 p.m.

****Hi curlysiren, Your last post was a much friendlier tone. Look, my mother was one of the first feminists in my small community of Mt. Carmel of the 1950's eleven miles up the road from Yale. That's MORE than half a century ago!!!!! Her feminism looks pale by comparison with today's feminism, but we are talking about a woman who wore slacks when to do so raised eyebrows about "lesbianism"; who drove a seatless, stand-up ten ton truck (with a five-gear floor-stickshift) , in an emergency to get plumbing supplies for a plumber, reluctant to abandon a metaphorical dyke he was plugging against a plumbing-flood at our house; a woman AND MOTHER who got a job when I was 14 because raising children was driving her crazy with boredom; who refused to sign a despicable neighborhood petition protesting African Americans moving next door to us in 1961 in our split-level WHITE neighborhood in West Woods and INSTEAD brought a casserole over to their house the day they moved in as she always did to welcome new neighbors on moving day. (My mother didn't give a damn what people thought.) Small but powerful examples of EGALITARIANISM to an impressionable child who adored his mother (moi). My point? I'm WITH you not AGAINST you.

But give me the benefit of the doubt and a little breathing room---I'm probably old enough to be your grandfather!! PK****
Posted by theantiyale on September 3, 2010 at 8:36 p.m.

Theantiyale:
I was never trying not to be friendly. I am also not trying to jump down your throat. I understood in the first place that you understand and respect feminists; I just didn't agree with your point. I respect where you're coming from, and while I can learn from those older than me, those older than me can learn from me as well.


Thank you for sharing about your mother. That was truly very interesting. I love hearing about people who stood up for what they believed in, no matter what.



Posted by curlysiren on September 4, 2010 at 1:21 a.m.

Thanks curlysire,

The reason I post here is I DO LEARN from the give and take of challenging assumptions. Age has zero to do with it. Attitude is the msot important factor, whther 19 or 91/

It's a lot more authentic and intense on the YDN posting-board than the NYTimes posting-board for example which is a bunch of stuffed shirts with ZERO give-and-take. Although I gotta say the new YDN website's posting board format has LOST its ZING .

All the home-made headlines are GONE and the username looks like the "ingredients" section on a Hershey Bar with about as much visual impact.The little genderless shadow-cameo-icons look like Monopoly pieces without their color or charm.

The whole thing is washed out, standardized and cookie-cutter eye-monotony compared with the previous posting-board. WHAT WAS YDN THINKING?

I'll keep an eye out for your username. And thanks for getting past the "disgusting... closeminded...and ... condescending " reaction.

Be well,
PK
Posted by theantiyale on September 4, 2010 at 1:41 a.m.

.. link text



PS: The mother of my childhood (1940's/50's) lived at a time when a man could beat his wife with impunity for not being "ladylike".

Wearing slacks, driving a ten ton truck with stand-up gear shift, clutch, breaks and accelerator, and defying racism DEFINITELY WERE NOT LADYLIKE. See her photo in link above. Unfortunately, she's in a dress!

PK
Posted by theantiyale on September 4, 2010 at 2:43 p.m.permalinkeditsuggest removal..


The Yale Daily News


Brodsky: A serious need for casual feminists



I came to Yale sure I could retire from my role as an angry feminist. I had stumbled across my political inclinations accidentally in my early schooling; I was a bossy, opinionated kid, and couldn’t quite figure out what being a girl had to do with anything. Gender equality struck me as such an obvious, logical necessity and I was sure Yalies would all be on board, so I could redirect my attention to more interesting problems.

However, my first few days proved me wrong. After the old “Sex Signals” workshop — which has thankfully since been changed — one classmate expressed confusion as to why it was OK for a girl to change her mind about sex after taking off her shirt. In Econ 111, I was rejected by two all male problem-set groups. In the Davenport dining hall, I was told that history was determined by great men, and maybe women just didn’t have it in them. I had come to Yale to try on a million different hats, but I found myself forced into an old one, shouting in vain — often literally.

This is a disappointing memory I share with many Yale women and one which I suspect many freshmen will soon carry as well. Unfortunately, it was also no exception to the pattern of subtle, ingrained misogyny, veiled by an air of enlightened liberalism, that I have continued to find for the last two years — a status quo that is both inherently harmful and which lays the foundation for more serious, dangerous sexism.

However, I strongly believe that this need not be the case for the next two. And for this, I turn to the class of 2014: We need you to be casual feminists.

Such a rallying cry might sound anticlimactic, but a large population of individuals each claiming a small stake in combating campus misogyny is exactly what we need. Of course, Yale must have its diehards, and I encourage all freshmen to run for the board of the Women’s Center, join a member group, write for publications like “Broad Recognition” or “Manifesta,” and contribute to discussions about reforming the University’s absurd sexual assault and maternity policies (columns for another time).

But those of you who will probably don’t need my encouragement.

The rest of you have just as important a task: Speak up. Women and men of the class of 2014, protect your friends who are targeted, and call out the insensitive. This doesn’t have to be dramatic; you don’t have to make a sign, change your attitude toward shaving or become a Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies major. If your entire class keeps an eye out for each other, sticking up for those affected by prejudices based on sexuality or gender, you can make Yale a safer place while debunking the myth of the separate feminist species.

Why do we need to move towards universal ownership of feminist concerns? First, when we leave all the shouting to those who are most offended, the point is easier to ignore. If a casual feminist called out classmates making sexist remarks in the dining hall or sitting around a common room, the disrespectful friend would likely reconsider his or her action. Yet currently, often everyone is silent or the token feminist at the table is forced to take on the responsibility. And when a message from any source becomes repetitive, it fades into white noise. This is particularly true at Yale, where the feminist is seen as a separate type of student, with a concrete wall dividing those who take on the title and those who do not. It is disturbing to see the number of students who genuinely support women’s rights but, because they don’t fit the stereotype, are reluctant to brand themselves as feminists.

The second reason such a shift is needed on campus is that the Women’s Center has better things to do with its time than wage dining hall war. I am not a member of the board and cannot speak to its views, but have as much a stake as any student in its functions. Clearly, the subtle sexism of Yale students is dangerous and requires a response. But seriously, we live in a crazy world and dedicated individuals shouldn’t feel they have to waste their time destigmatizing campus feminism when there are more pressing problems facing women at this school, in New Haven and around the world.

I must admit that, in addition to these two reasons, I hold another hope for this atmosphere of casual feminism at Yale. Fighting for our rights is about expanding opportunities, but for feminists on this campus, it can sometimes seem like each time we speak out, our options are narrowed. Class of 2014, you should be able to forge whatever identity you choose. Your concern for women’s rights should not limit your activities or predefine you in your classmates’ eyes. If everyone does their part in combating misogyny at Yale, feminism can be just another perspective students bring to all corners of campus, rather than a characteristic restricting young men and women to specific circles.


Class of 2014, if you start early, it can be done. We’re counting on you. Casually.

Alexandra Brodsky is a junior in Davenport College

Thursday, September 2, 2010

* Yale Daily News Penis Removed by Digital Software Sword









September 7, 2010
Letter to the Editor
Yale Daily News

Dear Editor:

 OK I admit I was wrong. The damn new posting board IS BETTER than the old one. Why am I so resistant to change?

 Paul Keane

PS I still hate the little Monopoly men.
_____________________________________________________


 Letter to the Editor
The Yale Daily News
(for publication)

I was delighted to read in the email edition of YDN today that the Daily News had renovated its 19th Century building, which I have long admired as a native of New Haven.

I posted a comment on that article this evening of 9/2/10, and an hour later the article was removed from the YDN digital edition. I won't even speculate on the possible reasons why it has mysteriously disappeared from the YDN digital edition this evening, where it had been all day.

Here is the substance of what I said: The Daily News may have done a fine job in renovating its edifice and making it shine, but it has done a poor job in renovating the YDN website, which is rather washed out, if not downright dull in its new digital incarnation.

The posting board, which used to permit signing-in with a caption which had a zing to it, has abolished that feature entirely.

This amounts to creating a newspaper without headlines, an inexplicable act of journalistic self-mutilation, apparently dictated by the new website's softwear, which also accompanies every post with a genderless, shapeless shadow-cameo icon similar to a plastic Monopoly piece (all made of ticky-tacky?) standing rigidly at attention like obedient soldiers on the left-hand margin of the posting page, forming a stack of soldier-icons standing one on top of the other from the top to bottom of the posting page. Zeig heil!

In addition, the mandatory sign-up for posting rights automatically places one's user-name uniformly at the end of every post much like the ingredients in a Hershey Bar and with about as much impact.

The result is a cookie-cutter, standardized, visually monotonous, graphic hypnosis: exactly the opposite of what journalism schools preach about laying out a page to attract the viewer's eye with graphic variety and peppery, pithy headlines, catch-phrases and designs.

Intended or unintended, the result is a POSTING BOARD WITHOUT HEADLINES which puts the eye of the viewer to sleep.

Nice job of journalistic self-castration YDN!
What a pity.

What ever were you thinking?

Paul Keane
M. Div. '80

PS
Like all institutions (especially those run by males) I am sure you are incapable of admitting you have made a MISTAKE, especially after you have signed the check for X -years contract with a software company. I will bet my shoes you will even find a way to brag that this monotonous digital nightmare contraption of a posting board is actually an improvement. So much for institutional self-adoration.