Thursday, February 26, 2015
Thursday, February 19, 2015
* The Digital Inquisition
Comments
theantiyale • 3 hours ago
REVISED VERSION
Onward STEM majors
Marching as to war
With the flag of Data
Going.on before.
Marching as to war
With the flag of Data
Going.on before.
Yale the royal master
Does the word proclaim
"Down with Bloom and Shakespeare
Humanities go in shame"
Does the word proclaim
"Down with Bloom and Shakespeare
Humanities go in shame"
Onward giga-soldiers
Crowns and thrones must go;
Let the flag of Data
From the Cloud above us
Ever wave and flow.
Crowns and thrones must go;
Let the flag of Data
From the Cloud above us
Ever wave and flow.
TIRUMALA: Theory in practice
Rhyme and Reason
staff columnist
Let’s put college into perspective. We
spend roughly four years here at Yale. For those of us who opt not to attend
graduate school, this is the last formal education that we will ever receive.
The vast majority of Yalies will spend the rest of their lives working in
industry. This is precisely why I’m stunned by the movement toward more
“practical” or “industry-oriented” curriculums in colleges across the nation —
particularly in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics.
“Theory”
has become a dirty word, and the reputations of the liberal arts colleges that
espouse its virtues have been questioned. But we should reject the notion that
an education without practical significance is an education not worth
receiving. Let’s not turn college into vocational school.
Now, the past few years have created a
pretty tough, if not cutthroat, job market. I sympathize with the idea that we
need practical skills in order for our resumes stand out amidst a sea of
applicants. But it is not the purpose of a college education to provide these
skills.
This mentality is pervasive in
computer science; there’s such a huge push for pre-professionalism in America today
that one of the first questions that I’m asked by prefrosh interested in
computer science is always, “What’s the startup culture like at Yale?” This is,
of course, followed by, “Does Yale help you find internships in Silicon Valley ?” Some students even choose to forsake
college degrees, with programs such as the Thiel Fellowship helping them do it.
Colleges have picked up on this
zeitgeist. The buzzwords of choice these days are “entrepreneurial” and
“project-based learning.”
According to The New Yorker’s Nicholas
Thompson, Stanford
University — famous for
students dropping out to join startups — is now less of a university, and more
of a “giant tech incubator with a football team.”
The value of a college education comes
from its ability to shape how we think. Education ought to give us an
understanding of the theoretical underpinnings of the world we live in, not
necessarily land us jobs at Fortune 500 companies.
Asking the “big questions” is more
than a cliché. Revolutionary ideas don’t come from learning more efficient ways
to crunch numbers in Excel or figuring out how to code a Snapchat-for-dogs app.
We change the world by questioning the assumptions that undergird the way we
live and do business already.
Steve Jobs transformed the way we
appreciate aesthetics by introducing design elements he gleaned from
calligraphy classes at Reed
College . Google was
founded because two computer scientists realized that there was a more
effective method to catalog and search Web pages than to simply filter
keywords. Mark Zuckerberg used social network theory and graph theory to create
a better way to interact with friends online. Theoretical knowledge enabled
these companies to get started. Practical knowledge is important, but theory
allows us to step back and see the big picture.
It’s more valuable to become a thinker
than a worker bee — mindlessly learning how to solve problems that countless
other people have solved before.
One of the most common complaints
students had about CPSC 201, Introduction to Computer Science, was that we used
Racket, a programming language that is all but useless in industry. I can’t
count the number of times that my engineering friends have grumbled about
learning something that they will “literally never use” in their lives again.
We probably won’t need half the
material we pick up in our classes ever again. What will be valuable, however,
is the mindset that we’ve picked up.
Now, we certainly need some practical
skills — but acquiring them is not the primary purpose of a college class. This
is where student organizations such as HackYale and summer internships hold a
comparative advantage. We should be learning these types of skills on our own
time. Let’s not waste the one time in our lives when we can learn theory
without the pressure of producing deliverables.
Non-STEM majors seem to have this all
figured out. These arguments are quite similar to the rationale held by many for
studying the liberal arts. And there’s a good reason why. Anybody can intern at
a company: Some of us did so in high school. Anybody can learn how to program
or learn the ins and outs of corporate America . We have plenty of time to
do that, the majority of our lifetimes, in fact. Let’s ignore our professional
lives for just a moment and learn for the sake of learning. Perhaps it will
even help us stumble onto the next big idea.
Shreyas Tirumala is a freshman in Trumbull College . His column runs on alternate
Thursdays. Contact him at shreyas.tirumala@yale.edu.
Monday, February 16, 2015
* There is Something Rotten in the State of Yale
"The book’s author, Jytte Klausen, a professor of politics
at Brandeis University , has revisited the episode
and condemned the Yale press’s decision in a Yale Daily News interview.
In a January 7 Time magazine op-ed Klausen argued that the Yale press
had censored her book in response to 'imagined' danger.
"There were no known threats against the press or against myself at the time, and there never have been any," her Time article argued.
Jonathan Brent, who was Yale University Press’s editorial director and the book’s commissioning editor, opposed redacting the cartoons at the time. He said on Wednesday, "The lesson it taught by caving in cannot be undone or papered over by all the volumes" in Yale’s main library.
"If the major educational institutions of the Western world cannot summon the courage to defend freedom of speech, who will?" asked Brent, who is now executive director of the Yivo Institute for Jewish Research inNew York . He said he
suspected the Yale press had acted to protect its corporate interests rather
than in response to any real danger."
"There were no known threats against the press or against myself at the time, and there never have been any," her Time article argued.
Jonathan Brent, who was Yale University Press’s editorial director and the book’s commissioning editor, opposed redacting the cartoons at the time. He said on Wednesday, "The lesson it taught by caving in cannot be undone or papered over by all the volumes" in Yale’s main library.
"If the major educational institutions of the Western world cannot summon the courage to defend freedom of speech, who will?" asked Brent, who is now executive director of the Yivo Institute for Jewish Research in
http://www.thefirstamendment.org/blog/2009/12/hear-no-evil-see-no-evil-condemn-no.html
Friday, February 13, 2015
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
Tuesday, February 10, 2015
Monday, February 9, 2015
Friday, February 6, 2015
Tuesday, February 3, 2015
Monday, February 2, 2015
* Dr. Spock for the Aged
I was born in what is now called Yale-New Haven Hospital in 1944. Ten blocks away Dr. Benjamin Spock was busy writing his famous 1946 baby book in his own childhood home on New Haven’s Cold Spring Street. The hospital threw me into what today looks like a heated breadbox (a 1944 incubator) to try to save my life. I was two months premature and my skin was the color of Guilden’s mustard. I lived.
Seventy years later medical techniques are far beyond heated breadboxes. Today’s doctors don’t just save lives, they stretch out death like warm gooey toffey, longer and longer, thinner and thinner, stickier and stickier.
Since the day I turned 70 I’ve been digging out travel tips for this gooey journey into old age, the one from which nobody sends postcards. If you're looking for a pick-me-upper in the next few paragraphs here, don't read on. These are let -me – downers , summaries of tidbits I’ve discovered about old age and dying, both of which I have no way of escaping, and one of which has already taken me prisoner. They are seeds of a Dr. Spock book of tips on how not to nervously lower your coffin, not confidently raise your baby.
The first tip comes from Being Mortal a book by a gerontology specialist, Atul Gawande, M.D. He says that even if they already have a terminal illness, the very first thing to check in an old person is not their heart, but their feet. That sounds crazy. Feet? Here's why. If they have bunions or in-grown nails they are more likely to stumble and fall ---- and if they break a bone they risk life-threatening complications a younger person might not have to fear. First things first: Make sure your old patients can be steady on their feet.
How practical. Why didn’t anybody tell me that when my parents were growing old? I guess because there’s no Dr. Spock book for winding down what baby wound up.
Here's another tip for travelers in old age which I found in a New York Times opinion piece by another gerontology doctor, Ira Byock, at Dartmouth entitled "Dying shouldn’t be so brutal. " If your old patient is on palliative care (pain drugs ) make sure they are given proper doses of laxatives adjusted correctly for the changing constipation which is caused by those drugs. Otherwise you are just swapping one pain for another. How come I didn’t I know that useful information? No Dr. Spock again.
Not one but a whole series of old age sightseeing tips appeared in an Atlantic article recently entitled “Why I hope to die at 75”, also by an MD, Ezekial J. Emanuel; “But 65 will be my last colonoscopy. No screening for prostate cancer at any age . . . After 75 if I develop cancer I will refuse treatment. Similarly no cardiac stress test, no pacemaker, and certainly no implanted defibrillator. No heart valve replacement or bypass surgery.” You can bet no Dr. Spock is cooing this lullaby over his patient’s living will.
If there’s a gerontology Dr. Spock-in-waiting at my birthplace, Yale/New Haven Hospital, reading this article, maybe s/he’d like to join me in writing
A Hitchiker’s Guide for the Aged for all of us, hitch-hikers on a one-way highway.
A Hitchiker’s Guide for the Aged for all of us, hitch-hikers on a one-way highway.
Actually, I’d rather create an entire curriculum for old age. Like college. You pass the courses and then you, ah, you ---- graduate.
___________________
ronricho has left a new comment on your post "* Dr. Spock for the Aged":
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Old age should burn and rave at close of day. Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Posted by ronricho to The Anti-Yale at February 3, 2015 at 8:17 PM
___________________
ronricho has left a new comment on your post "* Dr. Spock for the Aged":
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Old age should burn and rave at close of day. Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Posted by ronricho to The Anti-Yale at February 3, 2015 at 8:17 PM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)